Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Is the Fresno city council about to give the finger to fed funding?

BRT is in the news again in Fresno. It's sad for a variety of reasons, including the fact that they're arguing about funding when the system was originally supposed to open this year. Fun fact: the RFP for the BRT buses went out in 2011. A winning bid was selected but obviously the buses have not been ordered.

Today, the city council will vote yet again on approving funding. Not city funding, but federal funding, free money that has fallen from the sky and is intended to help the city fix a portion of its terrible transit system.

The money didn't come by chance. Two different mayoral administrations have supported seeking the grants (one democrat, one republican). A variety of city staffers have worked hard to submit applications for grant after grant, and have gotten the money secured - a giant coup as transit funding is limited and every city in the country is hungry for it. For example, the city grabbed onto $17 million in 2011, and a final $10 million earlier this year.

And tonight, thanks to some tea party logic, the city might just throw away a decade of hard work.

Earlier this week, Council President Steve Brandau had an editorial published in the Bee making his vote clear. Also clear was his inability to understand land use or transportation funding, his obvious lack of experience on FAX, and a magical way in which he can pretend large swaths of his constituents don't exist.

The feds and the state will pay for this bus with your tax dollars, but is that a good use of your money if we don't need the bus?

Read more here:

Most of the people I talk to are not planning to leave their beloved neighborhoods for residences on Blackstone.

Read more here:

This guy apparently believes that nobody rides the bus, and that people don't already live and work along the two busiest corridors in the city - even though 60,000 people do.

Naturally, the bus route will simply replace what are today the two busiest bus lines in the system.

However, I won't write more about his bad editorial, as other have. The Bee, for example, has devoted not one, but two editorials this week to the issue.

The first actually looks past Steve's argument and straight into his pocket books. His ridiculous excuses don't hold any water, but he says them anyway because there are players behind the scenes.

But now some council members are expressing grave concern about a system that would speed up bus passenger travel along the Blackstone Avenue and Kings Canyon Boulevard corridors. They say they are concerned about BRT being a boondoggle that eventually will cost the city millions of dollars in annual operating losses.

Our sense is that their objections are fueled by something else: a wish to undo the 2035 General Plan Update that the council passed in spring 2012. Powerful developer interests have pushed to tear up the update, which calls for 45% of new growth to be infill.

The reality is that if the BRT project is shot down during the evening session of Thursday's council meeting, city leaders will have to draw up a new general plan update.

Based on what the city has spent on the approved update and the BRT project, such a decision would send $7.7 million down the drain. That's not to mention the $2 million more it would cost to author a replacement update.

A tea party politician crying about costs and then turning around to send money down the drain? Par for the course. Housing developers working behind the scenes to ensure the city only offers single-family tract housing? Business as usual.

The whole editorial is worth a read, by the way.

Streetsblog picked up the story shortly after, with their own summary of the events. Angie Schmitt also made a few calls:

Christine Baker is a coordinator with a group called FLARE Together — Fresno Leaders Advocating Regionally for Equity. She said city government could go either way. In their opposition campaign, local real estate developers have teamed up with the Tea Party and the Amalgamated Transit Union, whose local leader is allied with Tea Party groups, Baker said. ”We have a local PAC that has been running fear mongering ads on local conservative talk radio: ‘If BRT is approved crime will increase in Riverpark,’” a shopping center.

Fresno Reborn  was next to put together an article about this folly. His lengthy rebuttal to the critics is well worth a read as well - it addresses almost every single point, including the ridiculous crime one.

He also goes into the economical need for BRT, which the other editorials missed:

Jobs: Having reliable transportation is essential to keeping or landing a job. Each day, residents in Fresno miss work, lose a job or cannot look for work because they do have reliable transportation. Many do not entertain the bus system due to the time consumption and that the local busses are completely at the mercy of multiple stops, traffic and unsynchronized signal lights. BRT would be able to control the lights, get ahead of traffic and have fewer stops. Those that cannot afford a car, choose not to have a car, or have automobile problems would have a reliable way of getting to work or looking for work on time. This in turn creates more employment, a stronger workforce and a more available citizenry. A reliable transit system also makes Fresno appear more attractive to business.
Unemployment is still over 10%, and we're still arguing about helping people get to work? 

The Fresno Bee published one last editorial tonight, and they actually beat me to the punch about what I was planning on writing this evening"

But, after these victories, there's a real possibility that a majority of City Council members are prepared to end the BRT quest and reject the $50 million with their votes this evening.

If this happens, it will send a message across the state and the nation — to government officials and private investors — that Fresno's political leadership can't be trusted.

Read more here:

Read more here:
One does not simply take $50 million, return it, and expect to remain in good graces.

The money was hard fought for, with reports, more reports, analysis, debates, and comparisons between peer cities.

The city was competing with not dozens, but hundreds of projects around the country. Light rail, bus, heavy rail.... every major city has been scrambling for federal help.

Fresno was one of the few that got it.

If Fresno says NO, the money rushes away - perhaps to Tuscon, or Ft. Lauderdale, or Honolulu....

And it won't come back.

Opponents of BRT say that they would prefer to see federal and state dollars go to beef up Fresno Area Express bus routes. That's fine, but what do you think the odds are of winning more grants after Fresno has stamped "return to sender" on $50 million?

Read more here:

Zero. Forget the fact that the GOP house isn't sending out checks - if they do, why would anyone send cash to Fresno over a shovel-ready project elsewhere that will actually break ground?

I am very glad the Bee published this final editorial, as I presume they get a tad more readers than I do. Hopefully, it acts as a slap in the face to the council members thinking of voting no.

If they vote no tonight, they're voting no on federal assistance for a long time.

Oh, and by the way...

As the BRT debate has heated up, things have turned ugly. Political consultant Tal Cloud is airing radio commercials intended to stoke irrational concerns about public safety. In addition, the Central Valley Tea Party has circulated an email predicting a crime spike at River Park if BRT is approved.

Read more here:
Tal Cloud? His Facebook profile indicates he lives no where near Fresno. In fact, he lives in a rural area being served by this massive highway project. He's complaining about $3 million annual costs (paid for by the feds)....odds that he also complained about the $100 million + dropped on the freeway serving his ranch?

Yeah, I thought so.

Please excuse any typos, this is just too much.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Construction well underway at GV Urban's Crichton Place townhouses

I swung around downtown a couple of weeks ago to take pictures of a variety of different projects. Today I'll be posting an update of the Crichton Place townhouses which are being built at L St and San Joaquin.

These technically broke ground 2 years ago, but were held up in a lawsuit. Granville knocked over a couple of 100 year old homes, and the lawsuit claims they didn't go through the proper process to do so. Now that the lawsuit wrapped up, construction is underway.

The project is two blocks from Fulton, where most of the other GV projects sit. The buildings are pretty much a carbon copy of the units put up at Van Ness near the 180.

Each unit will be 1,400sqft, have 3 bedrooms, and 2 parking stalls.

Let's start looking.

From across the street

 photo DSC06833_zps34888b32.jpg

Looking down San Joaquin

 photo DSC06834_zps7f8aa7a5.jpg

At the corner

 photo DSC06836_zps7df81360.jpg

Some nice, large homes here

 photo DSC06835_zps50326a1c.jpg

I really hope this project includes replacing that street light...

 photo DSC06837_zpsa8e8cb63.jpg

 photo DSC06838_zpsb567baf0.jpg

 photo DSC06840_zpse04abde5.jpg

Across the street

 photo DSC06839_zps52f38e3f.jpg

 Notice the sign?

 photo DSC06841_zps84a2be79.jpg

This building is directly across the street, and naturally I was curious. I assume that when built, this was a single-family home, but today it has 7 apartments.

 photo DSC06842_zps9a4a7295.jpg

View from the front steps

 photo DSC06843_zpscc42c2a0.jpg

I went inside, and was shown the two basement units, which are undergoing heavy refurbishment. They are being rented for $600 or so a month, which will be less than half the asking price for the units being built across the street. 

The owners were putting a great deal of work into the units, and seemed to be very friendly. If you're looking for a cheap unit downtown....I'd drop by.

The construction of the townhomes across the street should make these apartments much more attractive, as the street won't feel as desolate.

Further up the street...

I am unsure if that home is being refurbished.

 photo DSC06845_zps78f7e1cf.jpg

 photo DSC06847_zps60989f8c.jpg

 photo DSC06848_zps0d91d486.jpg

 photo DSC06849_zpsad6d2f50.jpg

Across the street...

 photo DSC06844_zps19320fa0.jpg

Google maps indicate a building stood there as late as 2009, before being demolished. The next door building is vacant, but very attractive.

 photo DSC06846_zps82cde348.jpg

Like all GV project, the sidewalk will be narrow. It's a shame that no attempt was made to match the landscape style across the street.

 photo DSC06850_zps337777d6.jpg

 photo DSC06851_zps90900754.jpg

The super ugly street light

 photo DSC06852_zps139196bb.jpg

Returning to the intersection of L and San Joaquin

 photo DSC06854_zps1f0f576a.jpg

One hopes the old curb cuts are on their way out.

 photo DSC06853_zps1f5559ac.jpg

 photo DSC06855_zps040d6384.jpg

 Rather than use the existing alley, residents will access their garages via a private gated entrance

 photo DSC06857_zps5b769b41.jpg

 photo DSC06858_zps02017b17.jpg

Directly across the street, the technology hub Bitwise

Today, the 8,000-square-foot building at L and San Joaquin streets is jam-packed with 24 small companies on its first floor — and 26 more on a waiting list.

Read more here:

 photo DSC06856_zpsf647ece0.jpg

And next to that is "The Rehab Centre"

 photo DSC06859_zpse63fb640.jpg

Looking back from San Joaquin, some interesting architecture

 photo DSC06863_zps3dc36c4b.jpg

 photo DSC06861_zps076662aa.jpg

And another abandoned building

 photo DSC06862_zps741a3f21.jpg

 photo DSC06864_zps43535de1.jpg

This intersection needs pedestrian improvements

 photo DSC06865_zpsf30d04eb.jpg

Hope you enjoyed the update.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Enterprise Trail Construction Under Way

It was only a month ago that I posted about Clovis getting a new trail extension. The Enterprise trail currently runs adjacent to a canal from Nees (near Temperance) to near Fowler and Shepherd.

The new extension starts at Temperance and runs along the canal towards the 168 freeway.

Oddly enough, the new construction does not connect to the existing trail. existing is green, new is in orange.

Let's have a look at what's been done:

While a gravel road runs along the canal, as is always the case, the trail runs besides that. I think it's a shame because you don't get to run/bike along the water.

 photo DSC07003_zpse0c3f39d.jpg

Unlike the rest of the trail, this segment is on the south side of the canal.

 photo DSC07004_zps5132e1e7.jpg

It's obvious where it's going.

 photo DSC07005_zps387865e5.jpg

Oddly, it runs right by this building.

 photo DSC07007_zps711e3414.jpg

 photo DSC07008_zpsfbdadb64.jpg

 photo DSC07010_zps0703289a.jpg

Looking back

 photo DSC07026_zps80dbf682.jpg

The area is still rural in character, but the subdivisions are popping up everywhere. 

 photo DSC07009_zps56b19bd5.jpg

 photo DSC07012_zpsba684ee6.jpg

 photo DSC07014_zps1a312eaf.jpg

 photo DSC07015_zps15c30f18.jpg

After running by the weird building and a large ranch home, the trail will  parallel a lot that's been empty for quite some time. Without looking it up, I'd wager it's zoned commercial, due to the highway.

 photo DSC07016_zps7b9a2d55.jpg

 The construction loses some definition.

 photo DSC07017_zps1c7ccf1d.jpg

 photo DSC07019_zps9663572e.jpg

I can't tell if construction ends here of it that work is part of the trail.

 photo DSC07020_zps0036afd0.jpg

Assuming the work is trail related...

 photo DSC07023_zps7723b06f.jpg

Looking back

 photo DSC07025_zpse2161334.jpg

This is the definite end of construction.

 photo DSC07024_zpsa1f27d0e.jpg

As seen from above, the trail will end randomly and abruptly, at least for now.

 photo enterprise_zpse34b833e.png

Back at the beginning, I am unsure what provision will be made for a road crossing.

 photo DSC07027_zpsd7e86d03.jpg

You can see where the trail ends on the right. To the left, the road has no crosswalk here, but a depression so that canal maintenance vehicles can cut across.

 photo DSC07031_zps1b19742b.jpg

I am unsure if a future trail will run on the north or south side of the canal, to connect to the existing trail. 

 photo DSC07032_zps47a19880.jpg

 photo DSC07033_zps7f75cf8f.jpg

The existing intersection is not convenient for crossing.

 photo DSC07034_zpsf316deb7.jpg

There is some good news though. The Bee indicates that road work will be done for the trail....does this mean embedded pavement lights at a crosswalk?

The article lacks in any sort of informative detail on the work:

Lane and shoulder closures will occur through February along Temperance Avenue between Alluvial and Nees avenues in Clovis.

A contractor will be working on improvements to the Enterprise Trail.

Motorists are encouraged to plan their routes so they can avoid the area or have more time to travel where needed.
Fresno Bee

Read more here:
Previous work in which a crosswalk has been built with embedded lights has resulted in a road closure of a month or so.

I've put in a question to see if this is the case here.

Edit: Received a reply from the Bee:

"It's improvements to the trail. All we were told. "

Sigh. Isn't the job of a reporter to get specific answers...?